Monthly Archives: December 2025

Yes, the 2020 Election Was Corrupt, but No One Seems to Care

By Rob Meyne

  • Dec. 29, 2025
  • 3-min read

Last week, Fulton Country, GA, admitted that more than 300,000 illegal ballots were counted there in 2020. More than enough to have changed the outcome, and there is no reason to think it only happened in GA.

The careful observer will recall that the entire post-election period in 2020 was a discussion between people who thought the results were inaccurate and corrupt, mostly Trump supporters, and those who thought you were insane if you even asked questions about it.

Notably, even the key players in Georgia, including Governor Kemp and Secretary of State Brad Raffensburger, protested non-stop that there were no irregularities in Georgia, the count was accurate, and suggesting anything else was tantamount to treason. They supported the anti-Trumpers from day one, and still seem to.

Four years later, Georgia authorities have finally admitted they were wrong, people like me were right (pardon the attitude there), and of course so was Trump.

Four years hence, there is nothing we can do about it. Almost none of the people who think questioning the election was wrong will acknowledge “we” were right, apologize for it, or suggest ways to make sure it doesn’t happen again.

In other words, the anti-Trumpers were wrong, Trump was right, and no one will let it change the way they spew hatred against the people they disagree with.

It is sad that proof of corruption in the election is not enough to unify us around a commitment to do better next time. Not one Democrat leader is advocating for more secure elections. Not. One. They claim any effort to secure our elections is rooted in racism or other inaccurate claims.

Why? Because corruption benefits them. There is no other explanation. Why else would a person oppose making elections secure?

The 2020 election, which Biden is said to have won, was corrupt. Votes were counted that were not legally cast and processed. Period. We know that. It is not an opinion. Secretary of State Raffensburger can claim it doesn’t matter, the law shouldn’t be enforced, or that he is from the planet Neptune, for that matter. None of those things is true.

It is an embarrassment when elected officials of either/both parties push back against making sure votes are cast and counted legally. If we lose that, there is no hope for our future.

A constitutional republic, and democratic values, require our citizens and officials to be informed, reasonable, and open to different opinions. Yet we no longer meet those criteria.

Logical thinking, reasoning, and civil debate REQUIRES us to learn, examine, and improve. We need facts, not opinions. And no one in authority has objectively looked at the legal issues from the 2020 election. No one has even investigated it. In the meantime, we are supposed to think a man who didn’t leave his basement to campaign got 81 million votes, about six million more than the previous record. Impossible.

The paucity of leaders who are willing to discuss this issue is not a minor problem. It threatens the very future of our nation.

Please share!

AI Reflects the Bias of Its Creators

By Rob Meyne

  • Dec. 6, 2025
  • 3-min read

As Artificial Intelligence controls more of our lives every day, it is disturbing to realize it is being developed to reflect certain prejudices and biases.

You cannot trust it, and I am not sure ultimately there is anything we can do about it. Figuring out what is true will get even harder in the future. It is tough enough already. But in days to come, we will have to be even more dedicated to discerning fact from opinion.

Recently I have been using, and experimenting with, Grok. Not Gronk. He was the tight end. Grok.

I was curious to see if it is biased, politically, and of course found that it is.

I asked it to give me a list of the payments members of the Biden family have received from foreign governments, individuals, and companies. Just a list. Just the facts, ma’am. 😊

Grok responded with a document under the banner of “… alleged payments…” they have received. Then when on to list them. For those watching at home, it was in the ten of millions.

Yet, the question, and the bias it reveals: why did it call them “alleged” when the payments are clearly and carefully documented, by the banks themselves, who reported them to the Treasury?

Following me? A list of proven payments (in exchange for no work, by the way) to Joe’s family. Even grandkids and in-laws. Fully documented. But Grok called them “alleged,” suggesting it isn’t true and creating doubt.

When queried further, Grok told me they use the word “alleged” not to question the payments themselves but to address the accusations of criminality that usually accompany it. But they called the payments themselves alleged.

And I hadn’t shown any interest in criminal charges or theories. Grok just assumed if I was asking about payments to the Bidens what I was really after is fodder for criminal accusations. Just looking for numbers and sources resulted in politically biased outputs.

They called the payments “alleged” even though they admitted in a later exchange there is no doubt the payments occurred.

It also recommended, unsolicited, that I ask for a list of Trump family business connections to other nations. I also didn’t ask about this.

Got it? They are doing everything they can to make it look like the Biden activities are basically the same as those of the Trump family.

Except, one, no one asked. (I also didn’t ask about the life cycle of the common shrew.)

And, two, the Trump family has a BUSINESS that involves real work, real property, employees, and sales worldwide. Grok suggests an equivalency between the Trump businesses and the Biden payoffs. But the Bidens have no actual businesses, investments, employees, products, services, or sales. They just have a series of LLCs, shell companies that take payments but have to real business.

There is a reason the name Trump appears on buildings, and the name Biden does not.

Artificial Intelligence reflects the biases of the people who develop it and the information from which they learn. It should not surprise us that AI output is flawed.

You may recall that Biden’s proposed regulations on AI mandated that it promote equity, which is the opposite of equality of opportunity. Equity benefits certain races and disadvantages others. Biden’s team built their own ideological and political prejudices into their AI regulations.

Many tech companies, their leaders, and their funders do the same. Finding the truth is getting harder as a result.

Please share!