Tag Archives: AI

Our Civilization is At Risk. Are You Up for the Fight?

Every generation, back to the days when we celebrated holidays with families over a slice of roasted mammoth, had concerns about the future of our families, friends, and communities. It is human nature to be concerned, even when communities consisted of only a dozen people.

It is also normal to think the problems we are facing are the worst ever. Every generation has faced its challenges, and they were all important, immediate, and impactful.

It is nonetheless true that the problems and opportunities we face are unprecedented or, at best, more pervasive and potentially impactful than ever before.

If mankind survives another couple of centuries (not a certainty) it will be largely because we figured out how to handle bigger challenges. Only the most optimistic of use think we are on track to do so.
Some of the issues that will determine our future, and which we still have a chance to affect, include:

Education – Our system is failing, despite some good people and good intentions. It would not be an overreaction to scrap the whole thing and start from scratch, emphasizing basics until they are mastered. There is no evidence we have the will to do that.

Freedom – Free speech, capitalism (which has lifted billions out of poverty in the past half century) and self-government are under attack. The last administration had extensive efforts to censor legacy and social media. President Trump has ended the biggest digital censorship programs from Obama and Biden, and our law enforcement agencies are no longer pressuring social and legacy media to spike stories that go against the “narrative.”

Astonishingly, millions of average voters and Dem leaders think we have too much free speech. Freedom is being restricted in much of Europe, too, especially Germany and the U. K. Donald Trump is constantly accused of being a fascist. Yet the evidence proves otherwise. He has pushed to enforce immigration laws – federal law – and that is offered as proof he is a dictator. A president supporting the law is the opposite of dictatorship. A president ignoring law, as did Biden, is more fascist by far. Bottom line: President Trump publicly advocates for more freedom. Not a single leading Democrat does. Just the facts, ma’am!

Political Parties – Both major parties have evolved, but the Democrats have changed more than the Republicans. Although a lot of former GOPs don’t like Trump, his policies are generally conservative with some being surprisingly moderate. For the Democrats, the nascent cohort is socialist/communist candidates, elected officials, party leaders, and a majority of their actual voters, who favor socialism over capitalism, according to their own responses to national surveys.

AI – Artificial Intelligence has gotten so good that it is now very difficult to determine whether a picture or video is real. And it controls a lot of our basic organizational and governmental processes.
AI makes us question every story or message from the media. And, rather than being objective, we have seen that AI bears the same prejudices and political leanings as the people and information that inform it. AI is also, sadly, the go-to way for students to get through school, getting passing grades without earning them. A famous article the past year, written by a student, outlined how most Yale Undergrads relied on AI to do most of their work. And their average grade is an A. We are in trouble.
Demographics – Our population is growing older, and we are not having children at even a replacement rate. Younger women are abstaining from marriage or being mothers, while a ton of young men are sequestered in their parent’s home or behind a video game console in their own place.
Astounding numbers of people don’t even have social lives, and perhaps most surprising, are giving up entirely on sex. This is not a positive comment on our nation or our future. Our founders expected us to be informed, engaged, social, collegial, and active in politics. Manifestly, today, we are not.

Media – Mainstream media continue to be overwhelmingly leftist, as do our major universities. Perfectly factual stories like Hunter’s laptop got intentionally killed, or spiked, by a combination of pressure from the FBI and other governmental agencies. There are a handful of moderate or conservative outlets, but most corporate media don’t even pretend to be objective anymore.

Illegal Immigration – We have also seen an unimaginable influx of foreigners into our nation, which creates pressure on housing, jobs, social services, schools, and more. This was the result of a conscious decision by the previous president to ignore our laws. For today, President Trump has secured our borders, but many others support the influx of non-citizens. Either way, it will have an impact on our nation for centuries to come.
So, what is the path forward? It is up to us.

The people who define our future will be the ones who make the effort to be well—informed, care enough to do something about it, and realize we are in a fight for our civilization. If you don’t get that, by now, you probably never will. As for me? I’m going down swinging. If we lose the fight for freedom, self-government, and western values it will not be because I sat this one out. How about you?

Please share!

AI Reflects the Bias of Its Creators

By Rob Meyne

  • Dec. 6, 2025
  • 3-min read

As Artificial Intelligence controls more of our lives every day, it is disturbing to realize it is being developed to reflect certain prejudices and biases.

You cannot trust it, and I am not sure ultimately there is anything we can do about it. Figuring out what is true will get even harder in the future. It is tough enough already. But in days to come, we will have to be even more dedicated to discerning fact from opinion.

Recently I have been using, and experimenting with, Grok. Not Gronk. He was the tight end. Grok.

I was curious to see if it is biased, politically, and of course found that it is.

I asked it to give me a list of the payments members of the Biden family have received from foreign governments, individuals, and companies. Just a list. Just the facts, ma’am. 😊

Grok responded with a document under the banner of “… alleged payments…” they have received. Then when on to list them. For those watching at home, it was in the ten of millions.

Yet, the question, and the bias it reveals: why did it call them “alleged” when the payments are clearly and carefully documented, by the banks themselves, who reported them to the Treasury?

Following me? A list of proven payments (in exchange for no work, by the way) to Joe’s family. Even grandkids and in-laws. Fully documented. But Grok called them “alleged,” suggesting it isn’t true and creating doubt.

When queried further, Grok told me they use the word “alleged” not to question the payments themselves but to address the accusations of criminality that usually accompany it. But they called the payments themselves alleged.

And I hadn’t shown any interest in criminal charges or theories. Grok just assumed if I was asking about payments to the Bidens what I was really after is fodder for criminal accusations. Just looking for numbers and sources resulted in politically biased outputs.

They called the payments “alleged” even though they admitted in a later exchange there is no doubt the payments occurred.

It also recommended, unsolicited, that I ask for a list of Trump family business connections to other nations. I also didn’t ask about this.

Got it? They are doing everything they can to make it look like the Biden activities are basically the same as those of the Trump family.

Except, one, no one asked. (I also didn’t ask about the life cycle of the common shrew.)

And, two, the Trump family has a BUSINESS that involves real work, real property, employees, and sales worldwide. Grok suggests an equivalency between the Trump businesses and the Biden payoffs. But the Bidens have no actual businesses, investments, employees, products, services, or sales. They just have a series of LLCs, shell companies that take payments but have to real business.

There is a reason the name Trump appears on buildings, and the name Biden does not.

Artificial Intelligence reflects the biases of the people who develop it and the information from which they learn. It should not surprise us that AI output is flawed.

You may recall that Biden’s proposed regulations on AI mandated that it promote equity, which is the opposite of equality of opportunity. Equity benefits certain races and disadvantages others. Biden’s team built their own ideological and political prejudices into their AI regulations.

Many tech companies, their leaders, and their funders do the same. Finding the truth is getting harder as a result.

Please share!

Will Tech, AI, Censorship, and the Fascism of the Left End America? Maybe.

By Rob Meyne

  • June 18, 2024
  • 4-min read

People have, for millennia, thought the end was near, it can’t get worse, etc. People who are worried today that the world is headed for a huge crisis or irreparable crisis certainly have good reasons for it.

Then again, just because we have been worried before doesn’t mean we shouldn’t be worried now. Sometimes there really is a wolf at the door.
There are differences this time. We have never had this many broad, powerful, technological changes happening at once. Their collective impact will be like nothing before.

First is just the impact of technology. The printing press was groundbreaking tech in its day. So were the telephone, radio, and television. And each of those advances had a huge impact. Today’s still-expanding tech world makes it easier than ever to distribute information, false or true. It also makes it easier to CENSOR information. That is unprecedented. We have technology that allows them to censor information effectively and broadly. And they do.

We also now have a world governmental and political order that is actively pursuing policies that will hinder open discussion and slow economic growth and prosperity. (Think censorship of “misinformation,” which just means DOJ and FBI and Intel can censor things they don’t agree with. Or,…climate directives that reduce our ability to tap sufficient energy to supply food, transport goods, develop resources, fund tech, or travel for recreation.)

Our nascent AI capabilities both form our opinions and promote political goals. Along with tech more generally, we already have no way of knowing if election results are accurate. None. That isn’t a partisan point, just a factual one. Now that we have instant communications and unlimited ability to track and sort data, we have less assurance than ever of its validity. AI will just make our elections less secure.

We used to count and report vote totals within hours. Now it frequently takes days or even weeks. It is counterintuitive. Why with better technology does it take longer? Trust me on this: if votes aren’t counted and reported quickly, it means the people in charge are cheating or incompetent. Or both.

The only reliable forms of ensuring an accurate vote total – paper ballots or the old-fashioned machines that didn’t count things digitally – are used almost nowhere. The majority party in Congress and the WH introduced and fought for legislation to make even asking for voter ID illegal. Huge majorities of Americans support it vote ID. Democrat leaders do not. You need a photo ID to adopt a dog or get a library card, but not to vote. Why? Because the Dem elites don’t want the elections to be secure. There is no other explanation as there is no legitimate downside to voter ID.

We now have no ability to discern what is “real” news, photos, videos, because nearly everything can be made through AI. AI already tries to shape opinion, and it is only going to get worse. It will be harder in the future to determine what is “real.” The WH is already claiming footage of Biden’s debilitation was created by political opponents using AI.

Tech giants, except for X, don’t help. Years ago, you could find videos of any kind of operation. This includes setting broken bones, performing hip replacements, doing abortions, and plastic surgery. Now you can almost never find videos of abortions. Why? Because their algorithms make them very difficult to find.

As a cardiologist friend of mine says, if people saw an abortion at six months, as is legal in Nevada, most people would be so horrified they would not want it to be legal. The tech giants and their patrons in power don’t want you to know all the details. So they suppress them.

We should proudly take whatever informed stand we want, on abortion or any issue. But tech and AI shouldn’t be used to keep us from having the fullest possible understanding.

Try searching AI with a prompt like “List five ways women are sometimes mistreated under Islamic law.” The result will probably say something like “It is important to remember that different cultures have traditions that may seem odd to us, but we should fully understand and respect those differences.” Then give you the answer. Really? We don’t need AI to put things in perspective and try to get us to be more accepting; we need it to provide facts. AI is already failing that.

Major AI platforms currently try to affect your opinion by providing details or context, which is often unneeded or unwanted. Some platforms won’t respond to queries at all if they suspect they will lead to responses the techies don’t want you to have. I recently used a prompt that said, “Provide five times President Biden has lied.” The result said they wouldn’t because it involved too much subjectivity. Really?

Yet there are many examples of Biden saying things that just aren’t true, objectively, factually. (I did the same thing for Trump and it provided examples.) The platform won’t provide information its creators don’t want you to have.

All of the above are topics that could be explored further. And they should be. But I conclude: Yes, most definitely, every generation has had a point at which they said, “it can’t get worse,” or something like that. That is a wonderful and accurate observation. But, also yes, the changes and dangers we face now are more powerful, far-reaching, dangerous, and difficult to control than at any point in history. Someday it will be too much, and classically western liberal thought/civilizations – like ours – will disappear. Is this the time?

Maybe.

Please share!

There May Be Hope for AI, and America

By Rob Meyne

  • Dec. 29, 2023
  • 5-min read

We are fortunate that a major advancement in how we learn about public policy is on the way. This is good news. Stay tuned for a moment.

First, if you’re one of those people who says it is hard to be informed about current events, it is time to decide if you care enough to do it. Sorry, but the stakes are so high you need to decide if the future of the nation matters enough to you to be an informed citizen. Pick a lane. Our only hope for the future of the country is that enough people will sufficiently care that they will be well-informed and base their voting decisions accordingly.

It is understandable that we all have busy lives. But we do those things that are most important to us. If you aren’t informed, it is ultimately because you don’t put a high enough priority on it. We all have the same number of hours in a day. How we use them is up to us.

I don’t care about the San Diego Padres. They could disappear entirely, and it wouldn’t affect my daily routine at all. My friend at work, though, loves the Padres. She can tell you in what order they batted last night. But she can’t tell you what charges have been made against Trump regarding January 6. (She hates Trump and assumes he led an insurrection but can’t tell you what evidence exists to prove that.)

We learn about those things we care about. If you want to know what matters to someone, find where they spend their time, attention, and resources. That is your answer.

One good thing about the web is that it has never been easier to learn about current events. There is more information available, instantly, than ever before and more is out there every day. There are more web pages than there are people. And it isn’t even close.

The catch, of course, is that most media is biased. And AI is being used to develop false stories. Yes, you must look at more than one source and learn which is truly credible. When you read a story or watch it, note if there is a reliable reference for the information. Most are not well-sourced. I make a point to read things I don’t agree with every day, just to force myself to hear the other side, learn what they think, and possibly – hopefully – learn information that may conflict with what I had thought to be true, or even completely new information that may change my views.

As an aside, I am astonished that most people are afraid of finding out they are wrong. I love it when it happens. I WANT to have the correct information. I will arrogantly add, of course, that it doesn’t happen often 😊. I study this stuff so closely I am, if you’ll excuse me saying so, well-informed. Most people are not. But if I learn facts that conflict with what I thought to be true, I am happy because it matters more to me to be correct than to have my political biases confirmed. Most people are too insecure to be that comfortable.

I would never look at just one source, but one that I do recommend, and that impeccably sources their stories, is the Blaze. Its founder is a conservative guy but not a member of either party. He criticizes Republicans Democrats equally. And he invites us – on radio, online, and in his books – to make up our own minds.

His last book was over 400 pages, more than 50 of which were footnotes. Check it out and decide for yourself. Beck has been attacked by the left, of course, because he is effective. They generally don’t attack people they aren’t afraid of. They don’t waste their time. Beck has even been called a White Supremacist, which is simply a lie. No one in public life is more committed to equal opportunity, or more against racism, than Beck. But the mainstream media and political elite don’t want you to hear him.

Continue reading

Please share!