Monthly Archives: September 2025

James Comey Had It Coming

By J Robert Smith

Sept. 27, 2025
2-min read

Bill Maher has decided that James Comey’s indictment is just Donald Trump’s revenge. That’s what Maher said on Friday night’s show. Actually, Maher isn’t original here. That’s the party line among Democrats. That’s certainly the line from corporate media. So, he’s just regurgitating with zingers and laugh lines.(For the record, Maher can be very funny. If I can’t catch his show, I’ll watch clips at X.) But he whiffs in the humor department here.

Catherine Herridge, now an independent journalist and one of the few good ones, posted at X on September 25:

“• Revealed Comey’s role authorizing media leaks (at least one involved classified information) through his FBI subordinates or through his Columbia law school professor Richman with SGE (Special Government Employee) status.”

Revolver cuts to the chase (September 26):

“The [Kash Patel led] FBI’s declassified investigation tied Comey directly to media leaks, including classified information he funneled through lower-level FBI officials, and even through his Columbia professor buddy. That professor should be facing charges too, unless he’s cutting a deal to save his own skin.”

Revolver summarizes:

“So no, this wasn’t a witch hunt. It was a long-running cover-up that finally collapsed like a house of flimsy cards. Comey thought he had all his bases covered, even planting family in key positions to shield him. But like every crooked scheme, it was only a matter of time before it all came crashing down.”

Wonder why a Comey indictment is only happening now? Revolver cites an X Post by Hans Mahncke (September 25):

“Then I learned that the now former U.S. Attorney, Erik Siebert (Eastern District of Virginia], was a Democratic Party backed pawn, which made the picture a little clearer. Next, I found out that Siebert’s deputy was tied to Trump saboteur Lisa Monaco, confirming the rot. But the biggest shock was discovering that James Comey’s own son-in-law worked there until today.”

Hence, President Trump’s insistence that Attorney General Pam Bondi get off her rump and hand Siebert his walking papers. Siebert was replaced with Lindsey Halligan, who was an attorney defending Trump in the ginned up Mar-a-Lago classified documents case. She was serving in Trump’s administration. Democrats are howling that Halligan is merely a water-carrier for Trump. More nonsense. First, U.S. attorneys serve at the pleasure of the president. Trump, like his predecessors, has the power to hire and fire.

Second, to put it charitably, Siebert was clearly “conflicted.” If there was anyone carrying water, it was Erik Siebert, hence, the endless delay indicting Comey.

There’s talk that more indictments are headed Comey’s way. What role did Comey play in attempts to frame Trump with Russia collusion? Indications are that then-President Barack Obama and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton originated that scheme. How was Comey in the mix? We may find out shortly.

Prediction: James Comey is an oily DC insider. Like most players in that town, he’s all about looking out for Number One. If he doesn’t think he can beat raps in a court of law – if he doesn’t get the level of political cover and financial backing he needs to pay legal fees – he may decide to cut a deal with prosecutors to save himself with a plea deal. If it comes to that, that may prove bad news for others involved in the worse conspiracy to destroy a president in U.S. history.

Please share!

Do We Have the Courage to Save America?

By Rob Meyne

Sept. 19, 2025
3-min read

Last week was an inflection point in U.S. history. I cannot say how the world will be different now, but I am confident it will.

Those who are familiar with Charlie Kirk’s work and words likely understand the importance of his assassination. The people who do not understand are his political opponents, ideological enemies, or those whose knowledge of him is limited to lies they have heard.

We will have more to say on this and related topics in the days to come. For now, let me ask you to consider one lesson we should learn.
His assassination proves there is one thing the left fears more than anything else: constitutional conservative Christians who can have respectful conversations with people who hold different opinions. We are feared because we are effective.

When people know the facts, and are open to a respectful discussion, minds can be changed. The left fears good will, kindness, and facts more than anything. Most of their political arguments are based on emotion and inaccurate assumptions. Their discussions don’t usually hold up under the light of truth.

Survey data repeatedly show the majority of Americans believe in conservative principles like those generally held by Kirk. Most Americans support reducing the size of government, lower taxes, respectful dialogue, secure borders, the welcoming of immigrants who come here lawfully, and don’t approve of grown men showering with their daughters. And he was a proud Christian and an effective apostle. For that he is accused of being an extremist.

The left fears conservative activists who are willing and able to debate the issues of our day in a way that is open, respectful, and successful. They are not worried about the most extreme, fringe conservative activists.

Charlie Kirk is not dead because he was extreme. He was not. Or because he was hateful. He was not. Charlie is dead because he was successful. He brought thousands of young Americans to understand and support our Constitution, nation, the value of the family, and the love of the Lord. Those are the things for which Charlie Kirk lived and died. Any time you want to know who is being effective, and who radical leftists fear the most, look at who they attack. That will tell you everything.

In a presidential campaign, your opponents will tell you where they fear they will lose. Just look at where they are spending their time and money. By the same reasoning, they will tell you who they think is hurting them in the political world. The people who are hurting them are the ones they attack. That simple.

In the case of Kirk, he was such a threat to the leftists that he was murdered. If that doesn’t tell you everything you need to know, you are beyond saving.

What should be our response? Be more like Charlie. We can change this world for the better, starting right now, if we commit to being unafraid to express our opinions, to debate in a way that is civil, factual, and persuasive, and to be willing to listen.

If every conservative patriot woke up tomorrow and did just that, we would change the political future of America, inexorably and positively.
How many of us have the courage to do that?

Please share!

Another Look at Gaza

By Rob Meyne

Sept. 1, 2025
5-min read

A lot of formerly conservative and reasonable political types have decided to blame Isreal for the chaos in the Middle East. It is fashionable. All the “cool kids” seem to be supporting the side that started the most recent battle in the region.

Notably, the great majority of them hold these two positions simultaneously: 1) Ukraine should fight hard against Russia until they win, no matter the cost. And, 2) Israel needs to be calm, measured, and proportionate in their response, while bearing all accountability for the suffering in the region. Got it?

It is hard to imagine an explanation for this other than antisemitism. Give us a better explanation. We’ll wait.

With respect to all those who carry a different viewpoint, the trend today is to blame Israel for a problem started by Hamas. And these positions are justified by believing reports on Israel that come from Hamas. It is as if we believed the mafia dons instead of the DOJ.

Hamas and their allies, including dreck like AOC and Omar and Sanders and Harris, justify and build support for Hamas while ignoring our long-time ally in Israel.

This just in: War is bad. Innocent people die. That is not the fault of Israel. It was true when the Allies bombed Dresdent and Hiroshima, and it is true when they attack Gaza City.

One solution, of course, for people who don’t like civilian casualties would be for them to not massacre innocents themselves. Israel did not attack Hamas October 7. Hamas attacked Israel, and there should be a massive price. For me, I can justify wiping out Hamas leadership and fighters, permanently, without apology. They have lost their seat at the table of reasonable debate.

Have you heard the mindless ranting that “war never solves anything?” BS. It is often the very thing that solves problems.

Were the Nazis a problem? Of course. WW II solved it. And millions of non-military casualties were part of the price we paid.

One assumes the people wadding their panties about possilbe civilian starvation – we actually don’t know how many people are starving, or why – would have opposed the ending of WW II because we bombed civilians. To say otherwise would be hypocritical.

No one is targeting civilians. Well, Hamas does, in a sense, by way of hiding behind them or under buildings where women and children are used by human shields.

Hamas started it, they are evil, they are among the most cruel and despicable governing bodies extant. (Name one that is worse. North Korea, maybe?) They are dedicated to wiping out all Jews, and America in the bargain. And people like Biden and AOC and Harris carry their water for them. And the Democrat Party has nominated a man devoted to wiping out Jews, and Americans, to be mayor of our largest city.

No one likes to have civilian casualties, which is one of many reasons our president is trying to end it. But implying Israelis are targeting reporters or children is irresponsible. And false. There is no accurate and credible information coming out of Gaza except possibly that from Israelis forces, American intelligence, and NGOs. And nearly all NGOs say Israel is not preventing food and other aid from getting to Gaza. But once there, Hamas leadership steals or misappropriates it.

It is up to you if you want to trust people who live streamed themselves raping, torturing, and massacring innocent people. If you give Hamas your loyalty or trust, God help you.

The food being distributed in Gaza gets there with the assistance of the Israelis and international aid organizations. Those same organizations deny the charges of Israeli genocide against Gaza. Genocide is the planned extermination, as a matter of policy, of a group of people. That is simply not what is happening in Gaza.

No sane person can blame Israel for the inexcusable ways Hamas treats its own people. They keep them unsafe, hungry, and in harm’s way. It isn’t you, me, or Benjamin Netanyahu.

BTW, there is no nation called Palestine, and never has been. A two-state solution has been offered repeatedly and rejected by the Arabs, including Hamas. And if there ever are two such states, one of them might be called Palestine. Fine. I couldn’t care less what they call it. But the often-repeated fiction is that the land from which Israel was formed was taken from a nation called Palestine. That just isn’t true. But you even hear U.S. representatives saying it.

“Palestinians” is a term that is widely used today because it was promoted by Yassar Arafat. He needed a good way to brand anti-Israel radicals. Thus the “PLO” cane to be. Which isn’t to say he invented the term, of course. But he recognized the value in seizing on an old term to represent a current cohort.

Today, millions of people want to “return” the “Palestinians” to a nation that has never existed. It is astounding how much world history is forged by false impressions and propaganda.

BTW, even major Arab nations in the region – Egypt, Jordan, for example – don’t want Hamas/Gazans. Egypt has a wall to keep them out that is bigger and more effective than anything we have on our Southern border. Arab nations won’t even allow Gazans in. Why do you think that is? Is it because the Gazans are loving, innocent people, blameless in it all, who just want rainbows and unicorns for a peaceful world?

Some, not all, of the Hamas apologists mean well. But sometimes the world offers moral clarity. This is such a time.

People who buy into all the anti-Israel garbage are doing the bidding of today’s Nazis. We need to pick a side, and they’ve picked the bad guys. Sorry to be so blunt, and nothing personal, but the anti-Israel propaganda machine has worked on a lot of otherwise intelligent and principled people.

Please share!