Tag Archives: American Thinker

The Feds Closing In on George Soros’ Operations

By J Robert Smith

February 1, 2026
2- min read

Clarice Feldman says this in her weekly roundup (February 1) of news at American Thinker.

In the U.S., attention to deportation protests, the search and seizure of the Fulton County, Georgia, election records, and the release of the thousands of documents in what are called the Epstein files are probably the key items of the week.

Minneapolis police (and now Los Angeles police) are cooperating with federal HHS officials as deportations continue.

Interestingly, the government signals it is going after the funders of the ICE riots. The U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia announced the planned move:

“If money is quietly moving crowds in the streets, Jeanine Pirro says it’s time to treat it like organized crime.”– Jeanine Pirro moves to block George Soros from allegedly secretly bankrolling protests across America — by introducing a new bill that could classify such funding as organized crime under the RICO Act. If enacted, Soros-linked accounts could reportedly be frozen overnight, triggering a massive political shockwave nationwide and igniting fierce debate over protest financing, free speech, and national security. Soros should be behind bars!!

It is a key tactic of the administration to go after those who fund evil. They’ve done it internationally, by blocking the narco trade, the oil shipments from Iran and Venezuela, cutting off funds for the UN and the USAID slush fund. Domestic NGOs are also under scrutiny:

Kristi Noem goes nuclear as DHS chief, exposing how DEMS CREATED A SHADOW GOVERNMENT to sabotage the nation!

She says Democrats built a massive NGO web at home and overseas designed to weaken and overthrow America’s constitutional system.

It’s probably no coincidence that with the cutoff of funds to USAID and the increased scrutiny on NGOs, the DNC is in the red, and it will be even more starved for funds as the smurfing operation Act Blue is increasingly scrutinized.

We know the FBI searched and seized the Fulton County election materials, and we already knew before that the 315 thousand ballots in Georgia were illegally counted. There’s an FBI forensic lab on site reviewing the seized materials, and I think they will probably find a great deal to support the necessity of the SAVE Act pending in Congress, which is designed to limit the shenanigans that clearly occurred in Georgia and elsewhere in 2020.

If RICO laws prove applicable, Soros’ left-wing operations will grind to a halt. Drying up the money to left-wing street and other disruption operations is a killer. It’s been a shrewd under-the-radar play by the Trump administration to go after the money. This also means criminal prosecutions. Stay tuned.

To read Clarice Feldman’s article in full, click on this link.

Please share!

Tucker Carlson’s Bombshell: Election Fraud is Far
Worse than You Think

By J Robert Smith

Feb. 18, 2024
2-min read

This weekend, I was drafting a piece for American Thinker. The subject was the lack of adequate election reforms in battleground states, much of that to keep the cheating in place. Per The Epoch Times, Trump may have already lost the autumn presidential contest. That’s sobering in itself.

I took a break to watch Tucker Carlson’s latest podcast on X. After I watched the entire podcast, I dumped the draft I had been working on all day. What I was writing only touched the surface of a far more sophisticated, massive fraud being conducted by elements in the U.S. government. We’ve all heard of the Deep State, but the specifics on how it worked well ahead of the 2020 presidential election to defeat Trump were stunning.

Carlson’s guest was Mike Benz, who leads the Foundation for Freedom Online. Benz’s bio at the group’s website states that he “is a former State Department official with responsibilities in formulating and negotiating US foreign policy on international communications and information technology matters.” So, he poses expertise, experience, and insider knowledge about the Deep State’s workings in matters related to communications and the internet.

The tease to Carlson’s interview sums it up powerfully:

“The national security state is the main driver of censorship and election interference in the United States. ‘What I’m describing is military rule,’ says Mike Benz. ‘It’s the inversion of democracy.'”

In an interview that ran a little over an hour, Benz skillfully provides loads of detail and a narrative thread that puts meat on the contention that we citizens really aren’t in control of of our government. Our impact on a presidential election – at least starting with the 2020 contest – is minimal if at all.

This isn’t said to dishearten anyone. Knowledge is power, goes the the old saying. Acquiring the knowledge about how elements within “permanent government” are acting in brazenly unconstitutional ways to determine the outcome of presidential and, perhaps, congressional elections is knowledge we must possess in order to defeat this novel form of tyranny. We mustn’t be intimidated by the scope of this attack on our rights and the rule of law. Fighting back isn’t an option.

Carlson’s interview with Benz can be found at here at X (formerly Twitter). You’ll be derelict in your duty as a patriot if you fail to watch this important podcast.

Mike Benz’s X account can be found here. If you have an X account, it will be well worth following Benz for more insights into what appears to be the greatest threat to our liberties in the nation’s long history.

The Foundation for Freedom Online website is located here.

American Thinker’s Andrea Widburg offers an excellent summary of the Carlson-Benz interview here.

American Thinker feature writer Clarice Feldman also offers this in-depth analysis here.

Please share!

Considering a National Divorce

J Robert Smith

Oct. 15, 2021
2-min read

This past week at American Thinker, both William Sullivan (another longtime regular contributor) and I addressed the idea of a national divorce; meaning, red and blue America separating. Sullivan’s article can be found here. Mine is here.

The differences between left and right in America are stark and, regrettably, growing starker. Some conservatives have floated the idea that a national divorce might be achieved civilly, if not amicably. In my American Thinker analysis, I argued that a civil separation isn’t likely to occur because of the nature and worldview of the American left. The American left isn’t led by the equivalent of Swedish social democrats who merely want to expand the welfare state and who are agreeable to living and let live … and who may gladly part company amicably if that was best for all concerned.

I argue that the left has no intention of dissolving the U.S. peaceful and fairly. That runs contrary to their explicit aims. Here’s the nub of the matter from my piece:

Continue reading →

Please share!