Tag Archives: Texas

Senate GOP Leader John Thune Better Get Smart Fast

John Cornyn had to do one, simple thing to secure renomination for his U.S. Senate seat: Publicly pledge to vote for the SAVE Act. Ken Paxton, who just butt-kicked Cornyn, gave him the opportunity. He said that he’d leave the Senate race if Cornyn did so. Cornyn didn’t do so. He couldn’t do so, even if he wanted to. He owed John Thune and the GOP establishment in the neighborhood of $100 million in campaign monies. The old saying holds: He who pays the piper calls the tunes.

Now, understand Ken Paxton knew this. His offer wasn’t much of a gamble. What it did was set up a beautiful political moment. Paxton declaration was intended to be the coup de grace for Cornyn’s campaign, and it was.

Cornyn’s loss was a face plant for John Thune, the establishment Senate Republican leader. He’s Mitch McConnell’s old protégée. First, Bill Cassidy crashes and burns, and now Cornyn. Crashes and burns, mind you, not gets edged out. Both incumbents are smoldering wreckage.

Thune and his DC circle made a predictably stupid calculation. They decided that Donald Trump was a lame duck, so his grip on MAGA voters was waning. They’d stay home. Surely, the country clubbers would prevail.

Trump’s endorsements of Louisiana conservative Julia Letlow and Paxton wouldn’t tip the balances, Thune reckoned. In any event, dumping truckfuls of money on those contests would push two very lame establishment inbreds across finish lines.

Seems reports of Trump’s political death were greatly exaggerated. MAGA not only remains loyal to the president, but they’re voting. Earlier, seven-term Rep. Thomas Massie was sent packing. Downing Cassidy and Cornyn was a clear message to Thune. “Not only do Cassidy and Cornyn stink, but you stink,” Louisiana and Texas MAGA declared.

Resentment toward Thune and establishment Republicans has been building among Trump loyalists (read: the GOP’s base). Thune stubbornly refuses to bring the SAVE Act to the Senate floor. Check that. He was glad to bring it to the floor in a way that was sure to fail. The Act is one of those rare measures that’s popular across the political spectrum.

Passing it – or at the very least, fighting to pass it – would accrue to GOP candidates benefit. What’s not to like? Let’s see a show of hands. Who supports cheating in elections? No brainer, but not for Thune, who says he doesn’t have the votes in his caucus to pass the proposal. Democrats will filibuster. Democrats would hijack the debate during a filibuster or some such. Excuse after excuse.

Then there is Trump’s desire to make recess appointments for his judicial nominees, who Democrats are stalling in the Senate. Thune’s determination to block recess appointments to preserve Senate tradition is costing conservatives’ wins on the federal bench.

If public polling is to be believed, Thune’s popularity in his home state, South Dakota, has cratered. That speaks volumes. As Senate majority leader, Thune funnels many millions of dollars into South Dakota. Farmers and energy producers (both major industries) benefit. But voters are turning off. Why? Because the GOP is now the Party of Trump. MAGA is dominant. Stalling Trump’s agenda doesn’t win votes.

So, Thune has a choice. Get in step with Trump and start pushing his agenda, or risk adverse political consequences. Thune should be ousted from his leadership position by fellow GOP senators if he fails Trump. If he’s not, South Dakota’s MAGA voters may do the job in 2028.

Please share!

Two Reasons Why the Red Wave Wasn’t… and What Republicans can do about It

By J Robert Smith

  • Nov. 24, 2022
  • 3-min read

There’s more than a couple of reasons why the expected Red Wave didn’t happen. Here, we’re referring specifically to congressional elections. But there are two reasons that aren’t very sexy but most definitely blunted Republican gains. One is early voting and mail-in balloting.

The second, which pertains to U.S. House contests, is redistricting. Republicans actually won about 6 million more votes in House elections in 2022 than did Democrats. The trouble was that district lines were drawn in such ways that diluted GOP strengths.

Redistricting is mandated by the U.S. Constitution. It isn’t a sexy topic. In fact, it’s sort of wonky, but in redrawing U.S. House district lines in 2021, Republicans were either out maneuvered by Democrats or victims of “redistricting commissions.” That depends on how states decide the every ten years reapportionment of House seats. Democrats were definitely aggressive in New York and New Mexico, drawing lines that lopsidedly favored them. Surprisingly, the New York Supreme Court struck down the Democrats’ grossly gerrymandered map, replacing it with a map that actually allowed Republicans to gain seats. No such thing happened in New Mexico, where Democrats drew lines that cost the GOP the one seat it held.

We can add that the U.S. Census, which was conducted in 2020, undercounted population gains in some red states, while overcounting population in some blue states. That’s more than a little suspicious.

There’s no point into getting deep into the weeds about redistricting. The next round of redistricting happens in 2030, though the U.S. Supreme Court will hear a Civil Rights case about Alabama’s lines being racially discriminatory in early 2023. Nonetheless, the cake is baked.

Continue reading

Please share!

Springtime for Mask Tyranny


By J Robert Smith

  • Apr 10
  • 4 min read

If you live in a red state – Florida, Texas, and Mississippi are on my mind – where your governor has decided that lockdowns (even partial) and mask mandates are pretty much wastes of times, count yourself lucky. If you live in a blue state – oh, say, New York, Pennsylvania, California, New Jersey – with a petty tyrant for governor, an inert or rubber-stamp legislature, and courts controlled by make-the-law-up Democrat judges, you’re still being forced to knuckle under, to one degree or another.

Continue reading

Please share!

Elections 2020: Trump and Biden in a Dead Heat in Michigan?

Flyover

  • June 29, 2020
  • 7 min read

Focus: President

Michigan: After being quiet most of the presidential election cycle, the Trafalgar Group, the only pollster to correctly project the Great Lakes states in the 2016 election, released new data for Michigan, and again they are cutting against the polling grain. According to their latest political research study (6/16-18; 1,101 MI likely voters), Trafalgar projects former Vice President Joe Biden to hold only a one-point 46-45% lead over President Trump, which is almost identical to Change Research’s (6/12-14; 353 MI likely voters) 47-45% published polling margin.

Continue reading
Please share!